





Thank you to all who attended our church-wide meeting on May 1st. The Building Committee is grateful to have had continuous input from the congregation throughout the process of designing the new building, and it was especially heartwarming to have the unanimous support of the congregation for the continuation of the building process.
At the May 1st meeting, the congregation approved the design of the new church, as well as a budget of $800, 000. Doug McNally’s presentation touched on the fact that although Bruce Wood’s original plans called for a timber frame, the Building Committee could not guarantee that a timber frame would indeed be affordable within that budget. He also indicated that cost reduction efforts would continue, and that the ultimate framing decision would rest with the Building Committee.
After careful consideration, the Building Committee has come to the conclusion that the cost of a timber frame cannot be accommodated within the approved budget of $800,000.
Timber frame background
An early decision of the committee was to replicate the exterior appearance of the historic building. Although the project cannot be considered a “restoration,” the Building Committee unanimously agreed to pursue the timber frame option because we felt it would be appropriate to the style of the building.
We also understood and valued the intangible benefits of congregation and community involvement in the process of raising a timber frame. In addition, the results of the survey conducted by the Design Committee indicated that the congregation expressed a preference for timber frame construction.
We realized early in the process that the timber frame option would be more expensive, but expected the savings from donated timber and volunteer labor to substantially offset the cost. At that time, we were working with a $75,000 estimate for a complete timber frame, including all materials and labor.
We selected Kent Hicks to serve as a construction manager, in part because he was willing to work with a timber frame. Bruce Wood endorsed the timber frame concept and made drawings to coordinate the timber frame with other construction details. Subsequently, Jack Sobon was hired to design the frame.
Budget process
During the budget process we were challenged by the Finance Committee to build for $750,000, and furthermore, identify options that could bring the total down to $650,000. Our best attempt resulted in a plan that would cost $800,000, using the less-expensive estimate we’d received for a conventional frame rather than a timber frame. Based upon the completed timber frame design, proposals from two local timber framers ranged from $105,000 to 175,000. Using the lower figure, and assuming that all the timber would be donated still resulted in a $50,000 premium for the timber frame compared with conventional framing.
Subsequent decision
At our May 11 meeting, the committee unanimously concluded that, given the budget constraints (including a relatively small contingency of 4%), the $50,000 premium for the timber frame could not be justified. The committee feels that potential reductions in other budget items, through refined quotes, or in-kind donations should be used to lower the overall project cost or to install a higher-quality roof, rather than to subsidize a timber frame that will not be visible when the construction is complete.
An additional concern of the committee was that the schedule for the construction of the new church could be seriously compromised by uncertainty in the time needed for logging, transporting, and sawing donated timbers.
Conclusion
Every member of the Building Committee was personally in favor of the timber frame option from the beginning of the process. It’s difficult for us to accept that we won’t have the community-building experience of raising the frame together. But because of the cost premium, we felt that it was our fiscal responsibility to eliminate the timber frame option.
Opportunities to participate
The Committee would like to remind the congregation that there will be many other opportunities for people to participate in the building of our new church. There will be site clearing to be done, flooring and wainscoting to install, and clapboards to paint, just to name a few.
If you’re interested in donating your time to the project, please call or email Carleen Madigan: carleen_madigan@hotmail.com or 634-5588.
If you’re interested in serving on the fundraising committee, please contact Wil Hastings: Wil.Hastings@gmail.com or 584-4957.
Thank you for your continued forbearance as we enter this next phase of the construction process!
The design of the new West Cummington Congregational Church began with studying the responses of the congregation, the history of the Church, and the historic context in which the original building was built. The question at hand was, "What should this building be?"
My sense is that there are a number of fundamental ways to answer that question.
The first would be to replace the building as it was, using the numerous photographs and memories of the congregation. I believe that there is enough information to do this well. New items would be incorporated as invisibly as possible.
The second approach would be to reproduce the exterior of the building, incorporating minor adjustments, and redesigning the interior to reflect current requirements, in a manner that is both modern and sympathetic to the historic image of the building. I liken this to a building that has an historic designation in which the exterior is protected and the interior is subject to change to meet current needs.
The third approach would be to design an entirely new and different building, inside and out, with entirely different material, details and image. This building might reference the old building, but through color and proportion, rather than through actual appearance.
An approach of which I am skeptical, is one that attempts to make a "somewhat traditional" and "somewhat modern" building. To me this would invoke an arbitrary choice of image and material, without the freedom to invent an entirely new building.
Having studied the comments of the congregation, the documents relating to the original building, and the code and program requirements for a new building, and having considered the place of the building in the village, it seems to me that the most appropriate approach is the second one; to design the building with an exterior which is essentially the same as it was, and with an entirely new interior, using the "bridge" of simplicity to span between the historic and the modern condition. The most remarked upon qualities of the old building are light and sound, and these qualities and nuances can be incorporated into the new building by design and careful study.